Forrester Changes Its Mind
In my open source talk I use data from a Forrester study that says that businesses are using open source for mission critical applications. This is why I found it interesting to read Matt Asay’s report that Forrester now says that virtually no one is using open source.
I generally like Forrester’s work, but this survey flies in the face of every piece of research on open source that I’ve seen in the last five years…including research from Forrester. Also, as the research itself finds, often its survey respondents are using open source even when they don’t know it: Nearly half of those surveyed by Forrester who are using open-source frameworks (e.g., Spring) still claim they are not using open source.
Forrester’s newest research finds:
- Seventy percent of decision-makers responded that they don’t have interest or have no plans to adopt open-source software;
- Only 23 percent of respondents said expanding their use of open-source software was a priority;
- Security is the main concern around adopting open-source software. Eighty-eight percent of respondents said it was an important or very important concern.
Matt goes on to provide some great stats on how open source is being used - and some of the data is even from Forrester.

July 1st, 2008 at 10:13 am
I honestly think that Matt has mis-characterized the research note that I published. In no way did I reach the conclusion that “no one is using open source”. What I DID say is that open source appears to have been slow to catch on with decision makers, with only 17% of the 1000+ software decision makers at North American and European companies reporting the they are currently using open source. I then went on to state that what seems to be a low interest in adopting open source for it’s own sake appears to be compounded by a general lack of awareness at the software decision maker level of the open source frameworks they may already be using courtesy of commercial products that wrap open source libraries and the use of open source programming languages. We’ve seen this pattern play out before; Linux or Eclipse comes into an organization through developer downloads, and it takes time for decision maker to realize the level of use in their own organization. If you read my response to Matt’s post, you’ll see more detail there.
July 1st, 2008 at 10:42 am
Thank you for taking the time to update us all. For those who were wondering - the link to Jeffrey’s note is here.