http://blogs.liblime.com/developers/2009/05/18/implementing-a-mixin-for-tagging/ Notes on software development, open source, and library technology Fri, 19 Mar 2010 23:08:20 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7 hourly 1 http://blogs.liblime.com/developers/2009/05/18/implementing-a-mixin-for-tagging/comment-page-1/#comment-12469 john.beppu Wed, 27 May 2009 10:27:00 +0000 http://blogs.liblime.com/developers/?p=224#comment-12469 In situations where you want to have a mixin or role but can't afford to pull in something like Moose::Role, this technique will get you a lot of mileage. It does not have any non-core dependencies, and it should work with any Perl 5 class. It's very light on resources, too. In situations where you want to have a mixin or role but can’t afford to pull in something like Moose::Role, this technique will get you a lot of mileage. It does not have any non-core dependencies, and it should work with any Perl 5 class. It’s very light on resources, too.

]]> http://blogs.liblime.com/developers/2009/05/18/implementing-a-mixin-for-tagging/comment-page-1/#comment-12076 john.beppu Mon, 18 May 2009 19:59:28 +0000 http://blogs.liblime.com/developers/?p=224#comment-12076 Thanks. This is a technique I've known about for a while, but I haven't had the chance to use this particular one until now. I'm a big fan of expanding behavior of objects "horizontally" via mixins, traits, roles, or whatever you want to call these named collections of behaviors. Thanks. This is a technique I’ve known about for a while, but I haven’t had the chance to use this particular one until now. I’m a big fan of expanding behavior of objects “horizontally” via mixins, traits, roles, or whatever you want to call these named collections of behaviors.

]]> http://blogs.liblime.com/developers/2009/05/18/implementing-a-mixin-for-tagging/comment-page-1/#comment-12073 Joe Atzberger Mon, 18 May 2009 18:40:05 +0000 http://blogs.liblime.com/developers/?p=224#comment-12073 Nice idea. Nice idea.

]]>